The fandom perception that Ron only passed his Hogwarts classes due to Hermione is messed-up.
Ron has almost exactly the same grades as Harry throughout the entire series (aside from DATDA), and he was passed all but two of his O.W.Ls with decent marks. Realistically speaking, the only class Ron (and Harry) had difficulty taking notes for was History of Magic, and even then Hermione is literally the only person in their year group able to stay focused during Binn’s classes.
Ron and Harry are both typical teenagers who dislike school-work, but still work hard when it comes to the crunch. Implying that they both only passed their exams due to Hermione is doing them an injustice. Yes, she did help them out occasionally (she is their friend, after all), but she didn’t take their exams for them.
I swear, if I see one more post about Hermione gloating over Ron’s supposed lack of academic skill, I swear to Merlin…
Right? Like, Hermione does help them, of course she does. And Harry and Ron both occasionally express the sentiment that they would never pass without her… but they’re expressing gratitude for her help, not describing reality.
Do they both get better marks for Hermione helping them study? Yeah, probably. As in, they both learn more because they study with Hermione, whose company keeps them engaged when they might have done something else if left to their own devices. Sure. In Hermione’s absence, I’d honestly expect that to be more of a problem for Harry than for Ron, simply because Harry has less incentive to get good grades than Ron does.
(I actually don’t like the assumption that Ron and Harry’s marks were identical outside Harry’s Defense score. We know they’re on par, and can make certain inferences about Ron’s OWL scores, but there’s nothing to exclude Ron having, e.g., passed History but failed Astronomy. I like to think there were little differences like that.)
Exactly. Yes, Hermione does help them out, which does help their chances, but she’s hardly the sole reason for them both passing their classes.
Ron definitely has more incentive to work harder than Harry does. Harry doesn’t really have to worry about the Dursley’s reactions to his grades, but Ron has to deal with the expectations of being a Weasley. All of his siblings (bar Fred and George) achieved higher-than-average grades. Ron finds it difficult to stand out from his brothers, but he also doesn’t want to disappoint his parents with bad grades. Surely this would have impacted on his grades at least a little. But no; he still gets almost exactly the same grades as Harry. It’s baffling.
I remember, earlier today, I saw an artwork where Hermione basically implied that Ron couldn’t pass his classes without her. It really infuriates me just how many in the fandom have taken on the ‘Hermione is brilliant at everything and the only reason anyone did anything good in the HP series’ attitude.
Y’all….Hermione wasn’t (and isn’t) perfect. She may be academically smart, but there’s only so much you can do with that. Hermione said it herself in PS/SS; there are more important things.
I also find it annoying how Ron and Harry got the exact same scores except for Harry’s higher grade in DATDA. I mean, Harry passed out during the History of Magic exam, and yet he still gets the same grade as Ron (who sat the whole thing). Ron’s no slouch when it comes to studying, and he has the advantage of having grown up in the wizarding world (meaning he would have known little trivia bits that Harry wouldn’t have). Why did he fail as well? He was even using the same notes that Hermione was using to revise. It really confuses me.
Considering his powerful non-verbal magic (often involving Charms and Transfiguration), you’d think Ron would excel in those subjects. Also, wouldn’t it have been awesome if Ron had (just once) gotten a higher grade than Hermione in a subject? Would that be too much to ask?








